Angus J Huck commenting on my previous post re Oaten.
"The tabloids had a raft of stories about David Cameron lined up last Autumn, but none of them appeared. That was because Murdoch and his friends decided that Cameron, not Davis, was their man. Other senior Liberal Democrats should watch their backs."
I agree, whilst I have never known such publicity it does seem that we are under media siege at the moment. Daily Telegraph "Lib-Dem's in Free Fall".
Had Mark Oaten not withdrawn from the leadership race last week, when would the story have broken?
If Oaten stood a chance of winning, wait till after the new leader is announced, unless by some quirk of fate Mark won the contest, break the story on March 3rd to sully the new leaders honeymoon period and the Spring Conference. The more likely scenario would be to break the story on the 1st March, when all the postal votes are in yet uncounted.
All this is a campaign to undermine and discredit the party to shore up the Conservatives. Given that no publicity is bad publicity perhaps this will backfire.
We can expect more of this I fear in months to come.
1 comment:
Interesting. I wonder (cruelly? or not?) if the entire recent LibDem Fiasco might be connected with Oaten's awful public midlife melt-down... Is it possible that without Oaten's sudden and voluble support Kennedy might have gracefully given up earlier, rather than launching that shameful don't-hit-me-i'm-an-alcoholic escape strategy?
Post a Comment